Caudle v. Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a federal court sitting in diversity “must predict how the highest court[s] of the state[s] would resolve [the] open question of state law”
• request for credit- monitoring costs for every class member for “an indeterminate period beyond one year . . . could readily exceed $5 million”
• “The case law has narrowly defined ‘rational basis’ in this context to mean the demonstrable presence of the toxin in the plaintiff’s body or a physical manifestation of the contamination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).