N.D. California· 4/6/2009
Ruiz v. Gap, Inc.
Citations
- 622 F. Supp. 2d 908
- 50 A.L.R. 6th 579
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28894
- 2009 WL 941162
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- entering summary judgment on negligence claim where plaintiff had experienced no instance of identity theft from theft of merchant's laptop computers containing job applicant data
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Samuel Conti
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationS.D. California· 2014-01-21· cited 82×
- Low v. Linkedin Corp.N.D. California· 2012-07-12· cited 64×
- Anderson v. Hannaford Bros. Co.First Circuit· 2011-10-20· cited 48×
- Randolph v. ING LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY CO.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-06-18· cited 46×
- Luxul Technology Inc. v. Nectarlux, LLCN.D. California· 2015-01-26· cited 34×
- In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationS.D. California· 2012-10-11· cited 32×
- In Re Facebook Privacy LitigationN.D. California· 2011-05-12· cited 30×
- Amburgy v. Express Scripts, Inc.E.D. Missouri· 2009-11-23· cited 27×
- Paul v. Providence Health System-OregonOregon Supreme Court· 2012-02-24· cited 24×
- Svenson v. Google Inc.N.D. California· 2014-08-12· cited 15×
- Kendel v. Local 17-A United Food & Commercial WorkersN.D. Ohio· 2011-12-05· cited 5×
- Moore v. Centrelake Medical Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2022-09-16
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court· 1993-12-27· cited 493×
- Pisciotta v. Old National BancorpSeventh Circuit· 2007-08-23· cited 357×
- Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-05-07· cited 310×
- Baur v. VenemanSecond Circuit· 2003-12-16· cited 286×
- Aas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 2000-12-04· cited 149×
- LaFleur v. WhitmanSecond Circuit· 2002-07-31· cited 129×
- Patent Scaffolding Co. v. William Simpson Construction Co.California Court of Appeal· 1967-11-29· cited 119×
- Internet Specialties West, Inc. v. Milon-Digiorgio Enterprises, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2009-03-17· cited 110×
- San Francisco Unified School District v. W.R. Grace & Company-ConnecticutCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1995-08-21· cited 82×
- Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Supreme Court· 1997-08-18· cited 57×
- Brandon & Tibbs v. George Kevorkian Accountancy Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1990-12-19· cited 57×
- Randolph v. ING Life Insurance & Annuity Co.District of Columbia· 2007-02-20· cited 48×
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. American Dynasty Surplus Lines InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-09-05· cited 47×
- Khan v. Shiley Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1990-01-30· cited 37×
- Zamora v. Shell Oil Co.California Court of Appeal· 1997-05-22· cited 33×
- Ross v. Frank W. Dunne Co.California Court of Appeal· 1953-08-14· cited 29×
- Key v. DSW, INC.S.D. Ohio· 2006-09-27· cited 29×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.