Skip to main content

Henderson v. State

Citations

  • 544 N.E.2d 507
  • 1989 Ind. LEXIS 314
  • 1989 WL 119797

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that exclusionary rule is not fully applicable in probation revocation hearings
  • noting that exclusionary rule is not fully applicable in probation revocation hearings
  • observing that exclusionary rule is not fully applicable in probation revocation hearings
  • holding revocation was \not error\ under substantially similar circumstances
  • affirmed trial court proceeding of combined sentencing and probation revocation wherein trial court took judicial notice of conviction of new crime to support probation revocation
  • “The burglary conviction provided grounds supporting the trial court in its finding that Henderson had violated his probation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pivarnik, Shepard, Givan, Debruler, Dickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.