Skip to main content
· 12/28/1999

Plue v. State

Citations

  • 721 N.E.2d 308
  • 1999 Ind. App. LEXIS 2219
  • 1999 WL 1257649

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that exclusionary rule did not bar evidence obtained as a result of illegal search and seizure at probation revocation proceeding
  • holding that exclusionary rule did not bar evidence obtained as a result of illegal search and seizure at probation revocation proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mattingly, Baker, Kirsch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.