Skip to main content

Whatley v. State

Citations

  • 847 N.E.2d 1007
  • 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 922
  • 2006 WL 1390166

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that signed and notarized probable cause affidavit alone was sufficient to permit court to find that probationer “violated a criminal law.”
  • explaining that “the rule barring a trial court from taking judicial notice of other cases previously before that court has not been applied to probation revocation hearings”
  • holding the evidence contained in a probable cause affidavit prepared and signed by the officer who personally found evidence of a crime was sufficient to support revoking probation
  • providing that the State is not required to show that a probationer has been convicted of a new crime, but only that there was probable cause to believe the probationer violated a criminal law
  • refusing to reweigh the evidence, although the defendant offered contrary evidence to that submitted in support of revocation, and affirming the trial court’s decision to revoke the defendant’s probation
  • relying on Henderson v. State, 544 N.E.2d 507, 513 (Ind. 1989)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb, Sharpnack, Najam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.