Indiana Supreme Court· 4/30/1979
Gardner v. State
Citations
- 388 N.E.2d 513
- 270 Ind. 627
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- when increased sentences are imposed, trial court should disclose the factors considered, to facilitate appellate review for sentence reasonableness
- when increased sentences are imposed, trial court should disclose the factors considered, to facilitate appellate review for sentence reasonableness
- \the assertions in the [presentence] report will be accepted as true unless challenged by the defendant\
- “the assertions in the [presentence] report will be accepted as true unless challenged by the defendant”
- “[T]he assertions in the [presen-tence] report will be accepted as true unless challenged by the defendant”
- assertions in pre-sentence investigation report will be accepted as true unless challenged by the defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hunter, Givan, Debruler, Prentice, Pivarnik
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
108 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anglemyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2007-06-26· cited 1,831×
- Smylie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2005-03-09· cited 272×
- Hammons v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 174×
- Carter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-05-27· cited 142×
- Page v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-08-26· cited 137×
- Windhorst v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2007-06-26· cited 103×
- Roney v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-08-24· cited 103×
- Schiro v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1983-08-05· cited 92×
- Harris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-09-01· cited 85×
- Page v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1980-10-07· cited 82×
- McNew v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1979-07-12· cited 82×
- Collins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-01-26· cited 78×
- Abercrombie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-03-10· cited 76×
- Humes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-10-06· cited 69×
- Funk v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-11-18· cited 68×
- Hoskins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1982-11-04· cited 64×
- Bish v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-06-10· cited 63×
- Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1982-12-29· cited 59×
- Haggard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1983-03-03· cited 55×
- Harrington v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1992-01-14· cited 47×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1949-06-06· cited 2,766×
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court· 1948-06-14· cited 1,667×
- Zap v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-10-21· cited 353×
- United States v. John Christopher DoyleSecond Circuit· 1965-10-11· cited 288×
- United States v. Martin SweigSecond Circuit· 1972-01-12· cited 142×
- United States v. Agnel JonesSixth Circuit· 1976-05-07· cited 106×
- Murphy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1977-11-08· cited 104×
- Winston v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1975-02-25· cited 41×
- Montes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1975-08-19· cited 39×
- State Ex Rel. Sendak v. Marion County Superior Court, Room No. 2Indiana Supreme Court· 1978-03-07· cited 25×
- Franklin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1977-07-21· cited 17×
- Martin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1978-02-10· cited 17×
- Garr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1974-06-18· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.