Washington Supreme Court· 8/20/1998
Hegel v. McMahon
Citations
- 136 Wash. 2d 122
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- bystander negligent infliction of emotional distress plaintiffs are restricted to those who were present at the scene of an accident
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Durham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court· 2001-07-05· cited 186×
- Kloepfel v. BokorWashington Supreme Court· 2003-04-17· cited 153×
- Snyder v. Medical Service Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 2001-12-13· cited 140×
- Kumar v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 2014-05-22· cited 138×
- Marzolf v. StoneWashington Supreme Court· 1998-08-20· cited 89×
- Orin v. BarclayNinth Circuit· 2001-11-09· cited 72×
- Eskin v. BarteeTennessee Supreme Court· 2008-08-14· cited 68×
- Haubry v. SnowCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-04-02· cited 62×
- Fernandez v. Walgreen Hastings Co.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1998-10-22· cited 60×
- Strong v. TerrellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-11-12· cited 54×
- Bylsma v. Burger King Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 2013-01-31· cited 51×
- Robert Repin v. State of Washington and Washington State UniversityCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2017-03-21· cited 43×
- Colbert v. Moomba Sports, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 2008-02-14· cited 34×
- Miles v. CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES DEPT.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-08-18· cited 31×
- Snyder v. Medical Service Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-12-02· cited 30×
- Schmidt v. CooganWashington Supreme Court· 2014-10-09· cited 30×
- Estate of Lee Ex Rel. Lee v. SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-06-15· cited 29×
- Miles v. Child Protective Services DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-08-18· cited 28×
- Estate of Lee v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-06-15· cited 25×
- Hawkins v. DielCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-11-18· cited 23×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 720×
- Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1993-09-16· cited 618×
- Paugh v. HanksOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-27· cited 441×
- Lejeune v. Rayne Branch Hosp.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1990-02-05· cited 264×
- Clohessy v. BachelorSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-05-21· cited 248×
- Ochoa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-07-29· cited 226×
- Hunsley v. GiardWashington Supreme Court· 1976-08-19· cited 207×
- Leong Ex Rel. Petagno v. TakasakiHawaii Supreme Court· 1974-03-28· cited 176×
- Gates v. RichardsonWyoming Supreme Court· 1986-05-08· cited 149×
- Folz v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1990-08-08· cited 112×
- Chan v. Society Expeditions, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1994-07-27· cited 107×
- Nancy P. v. D'AMATOMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1988-01-13· cited 98×
- Culbert v. Sampson's Supermarkets Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1982-04-30· cited 83×
- Beck v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court· 1992-07-31· cited 75×
- Cameron v. PepinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1992-07-17· cited 73×
- Heldreth v. MarrsWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1992-12-14· cited 64×
- Gain v. Carroll Mill CompanyWashington Supreme Court· 1990-03-08· cited 40×
- Croft Ex Rel. Croft v. WickerAlaska Supreme Court· 1987-05-22· cited 33×
- Cunningham v. LockardCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-05-08· cited 27×
- Budavari v. BarryCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-01-21· cited 22×
Other cases named Hegel v. McMahon
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.