Berger v. Sonneland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the objective symptom requirement is not necessary to prove emotional distress damages under chapter RCW 7.70. . . Price v. State, 114 Wn. App. 65, 72, 57 P.3d 639 (2002
• applying Maynard Inv. Co. v. McCann, 77 Wash.2d 616, 623, 465 P.2d 657 (1970)
• \A statute is ambiguous if it can reasonably be interpreted in two or more ways\
• medical malpractice under chapter 7.70 RCW based on unauthorized disclosure by a physician of confidential information
• “A statute is ambiguous if it can reasonably be interpreted in two or more ways .. ..”
• statutory interpretation is a conclusion of law, reviewed de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).