Hunsley v. Giard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This case concerns the right to recover for injuries, physical and mental, resulting from the negligent infliction of mental distress.”
• appellate courts will not consider an assignment of error that is not supported by citations to the record
• \The element of foreseeability plays a large part in determining the scope of defendant's duty.\
• driver’s duty to avoid driving car into house of another

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).