Miles v. CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES DEPT.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Assuming without holding that Dr. Feldman negligently 1 diagnosed MSBP, he and Children’s are immune from liability as a matter of law.”
• finding because the dependency court affirmatively decided the issue of whether the children were abused or neglected when it ruled the children were “dependent” within the meaning of former RCW 13.34-.030(4) (current RCW 13.34.030(6)(b)
• finding because the dependency court affirmatively decided the issue of whether the children were abused or neglected when it ruled the children were dependent within the meaning of former RCW 13.34.030(4) (current RCW 13.34.030(6
• upheld trial court’s determination that wrongful removal of children from home and their placement in dependency based on claims of parental abuse was not sufficient to support a claim of outrage
• an agreed order of dependency is final under collateral estoppel doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).