Nancy P. v. D'AMATO

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that certain justices “have been willing to acknowledge that objective corroboration of a plaintiffs emotional distress may sometimes be shown in the absence of physical injury”
• denying recovery for emotional distress where the plaintiffs did not have substantially contemporaneous knowledge of the outrageous conduct that was inflicted on the third-party
• where counsel fails to make proper objection, appel late review of ruling is generally precluded
• family member does not need to be present when outrageous conduct occurs but rather must have “substantially contemporaneous knowledge of the outrageous conduct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).