Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Second Circuit· 1/28/2010

Hayden v. Paterson

Citations

  • 594 F.3d 150
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 1887
  • 2010 WL 308897

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that equal protection claim must be dismissed because the complaint included “no specific factual allegations of discriminatory intent”
  • explaining that a Rule 12(c) motion is evaluated under same standard as a Rule 12(b)(6) motion
  • noting that Hunter 's burden-shifting analysis did not apply on an appeal from judgment on the pleadings and that the \only concern [was] the first step in this analysis\
  • stating that the same standard guides the court’s analysis of a Rule 12(c) motion
  • analyzing a claim that racial animus motivated the adoption of New York’s felon disenfranchisement provisions
  • affirming the district court decision granting a motion for judgment on the pleadings, and remanding for plaintiffs to seek leave to amend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker, Straub, Pooler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

239 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Hayden v. Paterson

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.