Hayden v. Paterson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that equal protection claim must be dismissed because the complaint included “no specific factual allegations of discriminatory intent”
• explaining that a Rule 12(c) motion is evaluated under same standard as a Rule 12(b)(6) motion
• noting that Hunter 's burden-shifting analysis did not apply on an appeal from judgment on the pleadings and that the \only concern [was] the first step in this analysis\
• stating that the same standard guides the court’s analysis of a Rule 12(c) motion
• analyzing a claim that racial animus motivated the adoption of New York’s felon disenfranchisement provisions
• affirming the district court decision granting a motion for judgment on the pleadings, and remanding for plaintiffs to seek leave to amend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).