Zherka v. Amicone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff’s allegations of emotional and psychological harm, which were pled “in a most cursory fashion,” were insufficient even to satisfy the more lenient facial plausibility standard applicable to a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6
• declining to “decide if allegations of emotional and psychological harm would establish compensable injury in a First Amendment retaliation claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).