Second Circuit· 8/28/2015

Willey v. Kirkpatrick

Citations

801 F.3d 51
2015 WL 5059377

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that courts must liberally construe papers submitted by pro se litigants \to make the strongest arguments they suggest\
holding that courts must liberally construe papers submitted by pro se litigants “to make the strongest arguments they suggest”
holding that courts must liberally construe papers submitted by pro se litigants “to make the strongest arguments they suggest”
holding that courts must liberally construe papers submitted by pro se litigants “to make the strongest arguments they suggest”
holding that courts must liberally construe papers submitted by pro se litigants “to raise the strongest arguments they suggest” (quoting Burgos v. Hopkins, 14 F.3d 787, 790 (2d Cir. 1994))
holding that courts must liberally construe papers submitted by pro se litigants “to raise the strongest arguments they suggest” (quoting Burgos v. Hopkins, 14 F.3d 787, 790 (2d Cir. 1994))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carney, Katzmann, Pooler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Willey v. Kirkpatrick

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.