Skip to main content

Hay v. Hay

Citations

  • 730 N.E.2d 787
  • 2000 Ind. App. LEXIS 955
  • 2000 WL 816232

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting it is “difficult to believe that the legislature intended to permit a child support agreement to be so easily circumvented by virtue of the differential in the support obligation amounts where there was not a change in circumstances”
  • father argued that the enrollment of the parties' child in a post-secondary education program was a substantial change in circumstances justifying a modification of support

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vaidik, Sullivan, Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.