Adams v. Adams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing with Kraft and holding that the appellant in that case “could show that he was entitled to a modification of child support by showing either changed circumstances so substantial and continuing as to make the terms unreasonable or a twenty percent deviation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Fiducial Investment Advisors v. Patton
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2009-01-29· cited 6×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Paragon Family Restaurant v. Bartolini
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2003-12-09· cited 129×
• MacLafferty v. MacLafferty
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2005-06-28· cited 128×
• Meehan v. Meehan
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1981-09-08· cited 62×
• Hay v. Hay
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-06-26· cited 32×
• Marriage of Kraft v. Kraft
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-07-05· cited 22×
• Garrod v. Garrod
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1992-04-15· cited 21×
• Sims v. Sims
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-06-21· cited 14×
• Counceller v. Counceller
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2004-06-16· cited 12×
• Holiday v. Holiday
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-11-29· cited 7×