Skip to main content
· 8/29/1995

Beardsley v. Heazlitt

Citations

  • 654 N.E.2d 1178
  • 1995 Ind. App. LEXIS 1035
  • 1995 WL 507175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where petitioner failed to submit completed, verified, and signed worksheet as required by the Guidelines, trial court did not err in denying modification
  • “[A] trial court is required to articulate its reasons when its child support order deviates from the result which would have been reached under the guidelines.”
  • worksheet requirement is particularly important where, as here, petitioner is self-employed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Darden, Chezem, Robertson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.