· 8/29/1995
Beardsley v. Heazlitt
Citations
- 654 N.E.2d 1178
- 1995 Ind. App. LEXIS 1035
- 1995 WL 507175
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where petitioner failed to submit completed, verified, and signed worksheet as required by the Guidelines, trial court did not err in denying modification
- “[A] trial court is required to articulate its reasons when its child support order deviates from the result which would have been reached under the guidelines.”
- worksheet requirement is particularly important where, as here, petitioner is self-employed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Darden, Chezem, Robertson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.