Borth v. Borth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[a] party may not advance a theory on appeal which was not originally raised at the trial court”
• “Where trial court findings on one legal theory are adequate, findings on another legal theory amount to mere surplusage and cannot constitute a basis for reversal even if erroneous.”
• “Where trial court findings on one legal theory are adequate, findings on another legal theory amount to mere surplusage and cannot constitute a basis for reversal even if erroneous.”
• “Where trial court findings on one legal theory are adequate, findings on another legal theory amount to mere surplusage and cannot constitute a basis for reversal even if erroneous.”
• “the trial court is charged with determining the credibility of witnesses”
• We concluded that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by including the cost of a vehicle in its calculation of college expenses as it was determined necessary to have a vehicle at school because the child lived off campus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).