Walters v. Walters

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a trial court “must consider [all] such factors . . . which bear on the reasonableness of the award”
• providing 5 that employment and income constituted a substantial change in circumstances which could justify a change in a party’s child support obligation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re: The Paternity of Jo.J., J.W.J. v. D.C.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2013-07-30· cited 10×
• Connolly v. Connolly
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2011-06-13· cited 7×
• Larracuenta R. Panfil v. Ralph E. Fell
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2014-10-22· cited 7×
• Peter D. Nugent v. Phyllis N. Nugent (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-07-07
• James Showalter v. Tanya Ray (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-02-17
• Eric Kennedy v. Michelle M. Wade (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-03-16
• In re: The Paternity of M.B. (Minor Child), By Next Friend, Briana L. (Wedding) Murawski v. Seth Logan Boyd (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-11-17
• Meleeka Clary-Ghosh v. Michael Ghosh (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-12-05

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mitchell v. Mitchell
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1998-06-12· cited 168×
• Meehan v. Meehan
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1981-09-08· cited 62×
• Bertholet v. Bertholet
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-03-27· cited 56×
• Hay v. Hay
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-06-26· cited 32×
• Glass v. Oeder
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1999-09-23· cited 27×
• Heiligenstein v. Matney
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1998-02-26· cited 23×
• Schacht v. Schacht
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2008-09-09· cited 19×
• Gibbs v. Kashak
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2008-03-31· cited 9×
• Vagenas v. Vagenas
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2008-01-30· cited 3×
• Marriage of Becker v. Becker
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2008-08-14· cited 3×