Skip to main content

Havard v. State

Citations

  • 94 So. 3d 229
  • 2012 WL 1624292
  • 2012 Miss. LEXIS 231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no need for supplemental briefing when the pro se brief raised no arguable issues
  • finding no need for supplemental briefing when the pro se brief raised no arguable issues
  • “A defendant’s right against self incrimination is not only sacrosanct, but is commonly known across this land.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carlson, Chandler, Dickinson, King, Kitchens, Lamar, Only, Pierce, Randolph, Waller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.