Hart v. Parks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the Due Process Clause protects a liberty interest in one’s reputation when it is “stigmatized in connection with the denial of a ‘more tangible’ interest”
• “Police may rely on hearsay and other evidence that would not be admissible in a court to determine probable cause.”
• “Police may rely on hearsay and other evidence that would not be 24 admissible in a court to determine probable cause.”
• § 1983 conspiracy claims and Monell 18 claims fail absent underlying constitutional violation
• conspiracy requires “actual 12 deprivation of constitutional rights resulting from the alleged conspiracy”
• prior conviction for similar crime may support probable cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).