United States v. Johnny Casel Nora

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a “warrant remains valid if, after excising the tainted evidence, the affidavit’s ‘remaining untainted evidence would provide a neutral magistrate with probable cause to issue a warrant’” (citation omitted)
• suppressing pursuant to Shetler where statements followed “immediately USA V. PARKINS 25 on the heels of the unlawful search of his person, which yielded marijuana and a large amount of cash”
• “A search warrant isn’t rendered invalid merely because some of the evidence included in the affidavit is tainted.”
• \A search warrant isn't rendered invalid merely because some of the evidence included in the affidavit is tainted.\ (citing United States v. Reed , 15 F.3d 928 , 933 (9th Cir. 1994)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).