Humphries v. County of Los Angeles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that inclusion in a child abuse database alters an individual’s rights or status because such databases “play[] an integral role in obtaining many rights under California law, including . . . licenses, volunteer opportunities, and even child custody”
• determining that, under California’s Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act, “substantiated” means “more likely than not that child abuse or neglect occurred”
• reasoning that rate of reversal in California could be as high as 50%, and, thus, many listed on child ábuse registry have \legitimate basis for expungement” and \insufficient means for correcting those errors”
• reasoning that rate of reversal in California could be as high as 50%, and, thus, many listed on child ábuse registry have \legitimate basis for expungement” and \insufficient means for correcting those errors”
• reasoning that rate of reversal in California could be as high as 50%, and, thus, many listed on child ábuse registry have \legitimate basis for expungement” and \insufficient means for correcting those errors”
• reasoning that rate of reversal in California could be as high as 50%, and, thus, many listed on child abuse registry have “legitimate basis for expungement” and “insufficient means for correcting those errors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).