Skip to main content
· 10/24/2011

Broude v. State

Citations

  • 956 N.E.2d 130
  • 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 1840
  • 2011 WL 5034297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the State presented sufficient evidence that the defendant committed child molesting as a class A felony where the defendant forced the victim to perform oral sex on him
  • No preparation-of- defense issue where “defense would have been the same no matter what the factual nature of the child molesting allegations had been.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Kirsch, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.