Skip to main content

Burkett v. State

Citations

  • 179 S.W.3d 18
  • 2005 WL 1397136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A person’s refusal of a request by an officer to submit to the taking of a specimen of breath or blood ... may be introduced into evidence at the person’s trial”
  • evidence was factually sufficient to find that defendant was intoxicated, as required to support DWI where three police officers smelled a strong odor of alcohol on defendant’s breath, defendant exhibited six clues on the horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN
  • evidence was factually sufficient to find that defendant was intoxicated, as required to support DWI where three police officers smelled a strong odor of alcohol on defendant’s breath, defendant exhibited six clues on the horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stone, Duncan, Marion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.