Tenth Circuit· 2/22/2000

United States v. Pearson, Eric

Citations

203 F.3d 1243
54 Fed. R. Serv. 418
2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 1060
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 2577
2000 WL 201169

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that where “the new evidence is a recantation of trial testimony, the trial court must first be satisfied that the challenged testimony was actually false” (citations omitted)
“A promptly filed motion conserves judicial resources and alleviates the concern that it is motivated by adverse rulings or an attempt to manipulate the judicial process.”
“A promptly filed motion conserves judicial resources and alleviates the concern that it is motivated by adverse rulings or an attempt to manipulate the judicial process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ebel, Henry, Briscoe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

72 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

93 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.