· 8/4/2005
People v. Dunkle
Citations
- 116 P.3d 494
- 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 23
- 36 Cal. 4th 861
- 2005 Daily Journal DAR 9396
- 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6895
- 2005 Cal. LEXIS 8587
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- highlighting “the unique demands of appellate representation in capital cases” (internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kennard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.