Skip to main content

Hardin v. State

Citations

  • 951 S.W.2d 208
  • 1997 Tex. App. LEXIS 4239
  • 1997 WL 461199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Requesting a jury instruction to which one is not legally entitled, merely for the sake of making the request, is not the benchmark for a competent attorney.”
  • “We conclude that [counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to the adequacy of the article 38.23 instruction] because, as noted above, appellant was not entitled to an article 38.23 instruction at all.”
  • “We conclude that [counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to the adequacy of the article 38.23 instruction] because, as noted above, appellant was not entitled to an article 38.23 instruction at all.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Anderson, O'Neill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.