· 10/13/1987
Harbor v. Deukmejian
Citations
- 742 P.2d 1290
- 43 Cal. 3d 1078
- 240 Cal. Rptr. 569
- 1987 Cal. LEXIS 426
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a bill regarding fiscal affairs only appears germane because of the excessive generality of the topic, thus, the one-subject rule is violated
- the multi-subject rule obviously forbids joining disparate provisions which appear germane only to topics of excessive generality such as government, public welfare or fiscal affairs
- the multi-subject rule obviously forbids joining disparate provisions which appear germane only to topics of excessive generality such as government, public welfare or fiscal affairs
- statute held invalid for violating one-subject rule where provisions included such diverse subjects as fiscal impact report submission procedures and public disclosure of complaints filed against licensees
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mosk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.