Skip to main content
· 1/4/1937

Bengzon v. Secretary of Justice of Philippine Islands

Citations

  • 299 U.S. 410
  • 57 S. Ct. 252
  • 81 L. Ed. 312
  • 1937 U.S. LEXIS 6

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • employing primary purpose analysis and holding that a substantive bill with an appropriation is not an appropriations bill qualifying for the item veto power
  • “An item of an appropriation bill obviously means an item which in itself is a specific appropriation of money, not some general provision of law which happens to be put into an appropriation bill.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sutherland, Stone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.