· 1/4/1937
Bengzon v. Secretary of Justice of Philippine Islands
Citations
- 299 U.S. 410
- 57 S. Ct. 252
- 81 L. Ed. 312
- 1937 U.S. LEXIS 6
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- employing primary purpose analysis and holding that a substantive bill with an appropriation is not an appropriations bill qualifying for the item veto power
- “An item of an appropriation bill obviously means an item which in itself is a specific appropriation of money, not some general provision of law which happens to be put into an appropriation bill.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sutherland, Stone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.