Jessen Associates, Inc. v. Bullock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \this rule applies also in determining what constitutes an item of appropriation\
• stating that \this rule applies also in determining what constitutes an item of appropriation\
• addressing merits of claim that bill addressed more than one subject
• in construing statutes, it is proper to look to construction given other acts pertaining to the same subject
• A It is generally presumed that every word in a statute is used for a purpose. @
• Supreme Court found fact that funds were appropriated elsewhere was significant in determining that the provision was not an item of appropriation and thus was not subject to veto

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).