California Supreme Court· 12/16/2002

In Re Rosenkrantz

Citations

59 P.3d 174
128 Cal. Rptr. 2d 104
29 Cal. 4th 616
2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 12006
2002 Daily Journal DAR 14087
2002 Cal. LEXIS 8317

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that Governor’s reversal of parole grant is subject to state judicial review
“[A] life term offense or any other offenses underlying an indeterminate sentence must be particularly egregious to justify the denial of a parole date.”
\[A] life term offense or any other offenses underlying an indeterminate sentence must be particularly egregious to justify the denial of a parole date.\
“[T]he Governor’s decision must be based upon the same factors that restrict the Board in rendering its parole decision.”
“[D]ue process of law requires that the factual basis of a decision ... to rescind parole be supported by some evidence.”
“[A] life term offense or any other offenses underlying an indetermi- nate sentence must be particularly egregious to justify the denial of a parole date.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: George, Werdegar, Chin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

224 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

62 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In Re Rosenkrantz

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.