Hapner v. Tidwell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding Forest Service’s fire risk reduction calculations well supported by scientific 12 For instance, in FOC’s response brief, FOC identified studies that the agency allegedly failed to address. Pl.’s Response Reply at 16 – 19. (Dkt. 35.
• Forest Service's conclusion that its project would not violate a forest plan was not arbitrary or capricious because short-term impacts to cutthroat trout would be off-set by mitigation measures

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).