National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the district did not err “as matter of law by failing to . . . weigh economic 24 harm to the public in reaching its conclusion” because “such an analysis does not apply to ESA 25 cases because Congress has already struck the balance” in favor of endangered species
• \[C]ourts may not use equity's scales to strike a different balance.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).