California Ex Rel. Lockyer v. U.S. Department of Agriculture

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring an EIS, EA, or categorical exclusion to comply with NEPA
• “Any possible effect, whether beneficial, benign, adverse or of an undetermined character, triggers the formal consultation requirement....”
• “An agency’s finding that its action will have no effect on listed species or critical habitat obviates the need for consultation.”
• described by Plaintiffs as: “treating an order reinstating a prior rule after a vacatur as an injunction”
• “consultation is required whenever a federal action ‘may affect listed species.’ ”
• “In determining the scope of an injunction, a district S 18 court has broad latitude, and it must balance the equities between the parties and give due regard 19 || to the public interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).