Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 1/16/2013

Hamadou v. Hess Corp.

Citations

  • 915 F. Supp. 2d 651
  • 2013 WL 164009
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7657

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “courts in this jurisdiction have granted both three and six year notice periods, depending upon the facts of the particular case”
  • noting that “‘courts in this Circuit regularly rely on [hearsay] evidence to determine the propriety of sending a collective action notice’”
  • noting that “‘courts in this Circuit regularly rely on [hearsay] evidence to determine the propriety of sending a collective action notice’”
  • finding that declarations of two plaintiffs, combined with testimony of managers and timesheets, were sufficient to infer common practice at defendants’ gas stations in two boroughs
  • explaining that when plaintiffs seek conditional certification that includes employees at locations beyond plaintiffs’ own job site, courts consider “whether the locations share common ownership or management’
  • finding statements in a declaration were “conclusory where they fail to identify particular employees or make specific allegations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMahon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.