Skip to main content
· 11/16/2010

Guillen v. Marshalls of MA, Inc.

Citations

  • 750 F. Supp. 2d 469
  • 18 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1196
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121419
  • 2010 WL 4627851

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that store manager’s evidence provided “virtually no basis on which to conclude” that he was similarly situated to all store managers nationwide
  • denying conditional certification where plaintiff lacked personal knowledge about employees’ compensation at stores other than those at which he worked
  • requiring plaintiffs to show more than “extremely thin” evidence of plaintiffs’ and the proposed class’s similar job responsibilities
  • “Orders authorizing notice are often referred to as orders ‘certifying’ a collective action, ever! though the FLSA does not contain a certification requirement.”
  • at the conditional certification stage, plaintiff must make “a modest factual showing sufficient to demonstrate that they and potential plaintiffs together were victims of a common policy or plan that violated the law.”
  • denying certification at the first stage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gabriel W. Gorenstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.