Lynch v. United Services Automobile Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the plaintiffs provided multiple affidavits from similarly situated investigators describing similar job duties and also alleged that the official formal policy was illegal
• finding that courts must not “weigh the merits of the underlying claims” at the preliminary certification stage
• finding that courts must not “weigh the merits of the underlying claims” at the preliminary certification stage
• finding that courts must not “weigh the merits of the underlying claims” at the preliminary certification stage
• finding that plaintiffs satisfied the “similarly situated” standard when the complaint, Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6
• noting that the court “does not resolve factual disputes, decide substantive issues going to the ultimate merits, or make credibility determinations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).