Skip to main content
· 9/19/2003

Gjurovich v. Emmanuel's Marketplace, Inc.

Citations

  • 282 F. Supp. 2d 101
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22089
  • 2003 WL 22177447

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding an allegation that the plaintiff “was paid the same weekly salary regardless of the number of hours he was required to work in excess of forty during any given week” was sufficient to warrant conditional certification
  • “Once the [pjlaintiff makes a colorable claim for relief, the only inquiry necessary is whether the potential plaintiffs to be notified are similarly situated to the named plaintiff.”
  • “Once the Plaintiff makes a colorable claim for relief, the only inquiry necessary is whether the potential plaintiffs to be notified are similarly situated to the named plaintiff.” (emphasis added)
  • “Defendants deny any wrongdoing or liability and maintain that all of their employees were paid in accordance with federal and New York law.”
  • “Once the Plaintiff makes a colorable claim for relief, the only inquiry necessary is whether the potential plaintiffs to be notified are similarly situated to the named plaintiff.”
  • “Once the Plaintiff makes a colorable claim for relief, the only inquiry necessary is whether the potential plaintiffs to be notified are similarly situated to the named plaintiff.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lisa Margaret Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.