Hallett v. Morgan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the district court properly applied the PLRA’s prospective-relief provisions apply to Plaintiffs’ a motion to extend jurisdiction”
• holding that plaintiff in a prison conforming to National Commission on Correctional Health Care standards “cannot establish that the lack of routine teeth cleaning constitutes deliberate indifference to serious medical needs” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• observing that “the lack of routine teeth cleaning” did not establish deliberate indifference to serious medical needs
• observing that “the lack of routine teeth cleaning” did not establish deliberate indifference to serious medical needs
• stating that broad discretion is vested in the trial court to permit discovery
• stating that broad discretion is vested in the trial court to permit discovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).