Ninth Circuit· 8/2/2002

Hallett v. Morgan

Citations

296 F.3d 732

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “the district court properly applied the PLRA’s prospective-relief provisions apply to Plaintiffs’ a motion to extend jurisdiction”
holding that plaintiff in a prison conforming to National Commission on Correctional Health Care standards “cannot establish that the lack of routine teeth cleaning constitutes deliberate indifference to serious medical needs” (internal quotation marks omitted)
observing that “the lack of routine teeth cleaning” did not establish deliberate indifference to serious medical needs
observing that “the lack of routine teeth cleaning” did not establish deliberate indifference to serious medical needs
stating that broad discretion is vested in the trial court to permit discovery
stating that broad discretion is vested in the trial court to permit discovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.