Biller v. Toyota Motor Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that “failure to provide a written decision to facilitate judicial review, even though required by the Severance Agreement” does not support vacatur under the FAA
• establishing procedure for confirmation of arbitration awards, and grounds for vacating, modifying, or correcting such awards
• “[I]f a party seeks a judicial order 9 confirming an arbitration award, the court must grant such an order unless the award is vacated, 10 modified, or corrected[.]”
• “§ 10 of the FAA provides the exclusive means by which a court reviewing an arbitration award under the FAA may grant vacatur of a final arbitration award. . .”
• “[A]rbitrators exceed their powers . . . not when they merely interpret or apply the governing law incorrectly, but when the award is completely irrational . . . .” (citation omitted)
• “[I]f a party seeks a judicial order confirming an arbitration award, the court must grant such an order unless the award is vacated, modified, or corrected[.]” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).