Second Circuit· 9/2/2003
Benjamin v. Fraser
Citations
- 343 F.3d 35
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18109
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming constitutional violation of inadequate ventilation at eleven facilities based on “the presence of large numbers of inoperable windows, clogged or dirty ventilation registers and exhaust vents in showers and cells, and poor air quality”
- affirming constitutional violation of inadequate ventilation at eleven facilities based on “the presence of large numbers of inoperable windows, clogged or dirty ventilation registers and exhaust vents in showers and cells, and poor air quality”
- “To establish the deprivation of a basic human need . . . an inmate must show ‘actual or imminent harm.’”
- “To establish the deprivation of a basic human need . . . an inmate must show ‘actual or imminent harm.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Darnell v. City of New YorkSecond Circuit· 2017-02-21· cited 1,487×
- Grullon v. City of New HavenSecond Circuit· 2013-06-19· cited 882×
- Iqbal v. HastySecond Circuit· 2007-06-18· cited 613×
- Shain v. EllisonSecond Circuit· 2004-01-20· cited 134×
- Plata v. SchwarzeneggerNinth Circuit· 2010-04-30· cited 57×
- Handberry v. ThompsonSecond Circuit· 2006-04-04· cited 42×
- Handberry v. ThompsonSecond Circuit· 2006-01-17· cited 37×
- Brewster v. Nassau CountyE.D. New York· 2004-12-13· cited 31×
- Robert Lewis Rosen Associates, Ltd. v. William Webb, Docket No. 05-3578-CvSecond Circuit· 2007-01-11· cited 30×
- Perez v. PonteE.D. New York· 2017-02-14· cited 25×
- Webster v. City of New YorkS.D. New York· 2004-08-27· cited 24×
- India.com, Inc. v. DalalSecond Circuit· 2005-06-20· cited 21×
- Henry v. Champlain Enterprises, Inc.Second Circuit· 2006-04-26· cited 20×
- Young v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2015-06-02· cited 11×
- Laube v. CampbellM.D. Alabama· 2004-08-23· cited 10×
- Morales Feliciano v. Calderon SerraD. Puerto Rico· 2004-01-26· cited 8×
- Shine v. HofmanD. Vermont· 2008-03-07· cited 3×
- Manuel De Jesus Ortega Melendres v. Russ SkinnerNinth Circuit· 2024-08-19· cited 3×
- Joseph Henry v. Champlain Enterprises, Inc.Second Circuit· 2006-04-26· cited 1×
- Skinner v. LampertD. Wyoming· 2006-08-07
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 28,443×
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court· 1976-11-30· cited 28,035×
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court· 1979-05-14· cited 11,438×
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court· 1996-06-24· cited 7,493×
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court· 1981-06-15· cited 6,761×
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court· 1998-05-26· cited 6,212×
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,564×
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court· 1997-12-15· cited 4,535×
- Helling v. McKinneySupreme Court· 1993-06-18· cited 4,262×
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 4,248×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court· 1987-03-09· cited 4,149×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court· 2001-06-25· cited 2,984×
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1983-11-01· cited 2,703×
- Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court· 1982-06-18· cited 2,433×
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court· 1963-02-18· cited 2,208×
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court· 1974-12-16· cited 1,400×
- Hoptowit v. RayNinth Circuit· 1982-02-16· cited 1,224×
- Hallett v. MorganNinth Circuit· 2002-07-17· cited 960×
- Heintz v. JenkinsSupreme Court· 1995-04-18· cited 924×
- Local 28 of the Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court· 1986-07-02· cited 724×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.