Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 8/27/2004

Morrow v. State

Citations

928 So. 2d 315
2004 WL 1909275

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that when there are disputed facts the standard of review is whether the trial court exceeded the scope of its discretion
concluding that a determination of whether the petitioner was or was not intellectually disabled could not be made based on the insufficient record and that conflicts in the evidence should be resolved by a trial court
finding that evidence that criminal defendant repeated the first grade three times and had poor grades in school were indicators of intellectual disability
\This Court is bound by the record on appeal and cannot consider facts not contained in the record.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.