Ex Parte Jose Moreno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that when the trial court weighs conflicting evidence, it must make a judgment call on the evidence’s credibility
• finding that there was no prejudice because applicant presented no evidence that the State would have offered a different plea deal that did not have the same immigration consequences
• observing that there was no evidence that the State was willing to accept a plea bargain for anything other than a controlled substance charge, which, under federal law, generally leads to deportation
• finding no prejudice where applicant presented no evidence State would have considered a different plea bargain that did not have same immigration consequences
• finding no prejudice when there was no evidence that the State would have considered or accepted a plea bargain for a charge not resulting in the same immigration consequences
• no prejudice shown where defendant failed to show different plea deal was possible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).