Hackett v. Barnhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a remand requiring the agency to address a conflict in testimony was sufficient for prevailing party status
• finding that government must justify both its position in any underlying administrative proceedings and in any subsequent court litigation
• noting a substantially justified litigation position does not necessarily offset prelitigation conduct that was without a reasonable basis
• describing the circumstances under which a successful litigant is entitled to recover attorney’s fees under EAJA
• explaining “that EAJA ‘fees generally should be awarded where the government’s underlying action was unreasonable even if the government advanced a reasonable litigation position”
• requiring a district court to determine on remand “the reasonableness of the requested fees”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Krauser v. Astrue
  Tenth Circuit· 2011-05-06· cited 389×
• Walters v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 2013-01-08· cited 88×
• United States v. Hasan
  Tenth Circuit· 2010-06-23· cited 32×
• Madron v. Astrue
  Tenth Circuit· 2011-02-04· cited 32×
• Al-Maleki v. Holder
  Tenth Circuit· 2009-03-18· cited 27×
• Madrid v. Astrue
  Tenth Circuit· 2007-07-18· cited 24×
• Gatimi v. Holder
  Seventh Circuit· 2010-05-17· cited 20×
• Ward v. United States Postal Service
  Federal Circuit· 2012-03-12· cited 14×
• R.M. Investment Co. v. United States Forest Service
  Tenth Circuit· 2007-12-28· cited 12×
• United States v. Johnson
  Tenth Circuit· 2019-03-29· cited 9×
• W. M. v. C. v. William Barr, U.S. Atty Gen
  Fifth Circuit· 2019-06-07· cited 9×
• Vincent v. Berryhill
  W.D. Oklahoma· 2017-03-27· cited 9×
• Manchester v. Funderburgh (In re Funderburgh)
  Tenth Circuit· 2015-02-02· cited 5×
• Delgadillo v. Astrue
  D. Colorado· 2007-08-21· cited 2×
• Madron v. Astrue
  Tenth Circuit· 2011-03-15
• Ward v. U.S. Postal Service
  Federal Circuit· 2012-03-12
• Wait v. Astrue
  D. Kansas· 2007-07-05
• Susan Manchester v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
  Tenth Circuit· 2015-02-02

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pierce v. Underwood
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-27· cited 6,197×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1947-06-23· cited 3,981×
• Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jean
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 1,875×
• Hackett v. Barnhart
  Tenth Circuit· 2005-01-24· cited 980×
• Scarborough v. Principi
  Supreme Court· 2004-05-03· cited 692×
• Allen v. Barnhart
  Tenth Circuit· 2004-02-04· cited 653×
• Robert M. Haddock v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration
  Tenth Circuit· 1999-11-09· cited 493×
• Saluja Thangaraja v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-11-03· cited 323×
• Edelman v. Lynchburg College
  Supreme Court· 2002-03-19· cited 238×
• Esther Marcus v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services
  Seventh Circuit· 1994-05-24· cited 173×
• Kiowa Indian Tribe v. Hoover
  Tenth Circuit· 1998-07-13· cited 168×
• Mickeviciute v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
  Tenth Circuit· 2003-04-28· cited 120×
• Michael E. Golembiewski v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security
  Seventh Circuit· 2004-08-31· cited 117×
• Morgan v. Perry
  Third Circuit· 1998-05-05· cited 89×
• Eric Cunningham v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security
  Seventh Circuit· 2006-03-07· cited 64×
• Ecology Center, Inc. v. United States Forest Service
  Tenth Circuit· 2006-06-29· cited 43×
• Nathaniel Keon Smith, by His Mother and Next Friend Sanova Smith v. Otis Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services
  Second Circuit· 1989-01-26· cited 41×
• Gilbert v. Shalala
  Tenth Circuit· 1995-01-17· cited 37×
• TAYLOR, Catherine D., Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services
  Third Circuit· 1988-02-29· cited 32×