Skip to main content
· 11/3/2005

Saluja Thangaraja v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

Citations

  • 428 F.3d 870
  • 2005 WL 2978856

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting enhanced fees where attorney's specialized knowledge was not necessary in routine immigration case
  • cost-of-living increases are calculated by multiplying the $125 statutory maximum hourly rate by the annual average consumer price index figure for all urban consumers (“CPI-U”) for the years in which the attorney’s work was performed and dividing by the CPI-U figure for March 1996 (155.7
  • “Our holding that the agency’s decision of Thangaraja’s case was unsupported by substantial evidence is therefore a strong indication that the ‘position of the United States’ in this matter was not substantially justified.”
  • calculating hourly rate adjustments using the national CPI

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fletcher, Leavy, Berzon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.