Madrid v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discounting report of physician “who neither examined [the claimant] nor spoke to him or to any of his treating physicians” and concluded—contrary to the “objective medical evidence” and “without explanation”—that the claimant could work

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).