Gustavia Home, LLC v. Bent

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plaintiff “establishe[d] a prima facie case of entitlement to judgement” because the plaintiff submitted copies of the mortgage and note and an affidavit establishing that the borrower had defaulted on the loan
• finding that affidavit stating that “defendant . . . failed to cure the default” was sufficient proof of borrower’s default
• finding that “copies of the [m]ortgage, [n]ote, allonges, and chain of assignments” was “evidence . . . that establishe[d] a prima facie case of entitlement to judgment”
• finding that “copies of the [m]ortgage, [n]ote, allonges, and chain of assignments” was “evidence . . . that establishes a prima facie case of entitlement to judgment”
• accepting as proof of default the affidavit 14 of plaintiff-mortgagee’s single member, stating based on “his own knowledge and from reviewing Plaintiffs business records kept in the ordinary course of Plaintiffs business” that defendant failed to cure the default
• “Once the plaintiff submits the mortgage, the unpaid note, and evidence of the default, it has demonstrated its prima facie case of entitlement to judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).