Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 7/31/2002

Caldarola v. Calabrese

Citations

  • 298 F.3d 156
  • 2002 WL 1759778

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the nonmoving party “must come forward with specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial”
  • requiring the non-moving party to “do more than simply show that there is some metaphysical doubt as to the material facts.... ”
  • “There is no dispute that this broad right to be free of arrest without probable cause [is] clearly established”
  • “We consider only information [the officer] relied on in concluding that there was probable cause to arrest [the plaintiff],” not every theoretically plausible piece of exculpatory evidence or claim of innocence that might have existed.
  • “The nonmoving party must come forward with specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.”
  • arguable probable cause exists where officer holds reasonable, albeit mistaken, belief as to probable cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graafeiland, Meskill, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

140 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.